Who Grabbed this Public Land?
cattle dip |
Part of cattle dip |
Part
of Amua land holds a cattle dip which is in total disuse. Though the then
councillor, Julius Kamotho, did a commendable job restoring it during his
tenure, no one, it seems, can recall when the last of livestock took a swim
into the treatment liquid. Even if the said cattle dip is in use, where is a
livestock holding area? Witness the fenced off thoroughfare to conduct the
livestock all the way to the channel. Your first impression is that one is
driving livestock to an individual’s home (and trespassing in the process).
A farmed part in Amua |
It
is a matter of time before the cattle dip disappears altogether. With the logic
that most of the small scale farmers to the proximity of the dip practises
mixed farming and prefers zero-grazing units and would be comfortable hand
spraying their livestock, what use will this dip serve in the long term? Already,
part of the contentious land had been parcelled out and resold with
construction works abuzz where secondary buyers are putting up houses.
5.4 acres is by no means little to host facilities for public use. If,
for instance, a public hospital is put up at the place, it would ease the access to a health facility for majority of residents and cut the time it takes
to reach health centers like Kiwamu and Dundori. By the way, what happened to the Catholic run
Hekima Mobile Clinic that used to operate every Thursday ages ago? And speaking
of the Catholic church, can the church explain how part of public land where a
kindergarten once stood changed hands with the eventual fencing off of the said
land?
By
the way, is there any public land for recreational activities? Other than using
school playgrounds, where do children play or youths train at for their
unstructured village league matches?
That
we have such bold land grabbers is not contestable. It seems getting a piece of
whatever acreage as a financial statement has become the norm. Shockingly,
majority do not exercise due diligence like searching with lands office on
status of such land (if public or private), but will buy anyway, so long as the sellers or brokers are trustworthy persons!
The
problem with victims of syndicated land cons is they do not know they are
victims. And this is what will see dragging court cases should the authorities
of the day try to enforce evictions.
Comments
Post a Comment